Writing an editorial for a scientific journal refers
Write a letter to editor for publishing a research paper
Editors write editorials in which a disproportionate number of articles from their own journal are cited. Additional Resources:. Collection can take place either at manuscript submission or at some point during the peer-review process, preferably prior to any commitment to accept and publish a study. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. All correspondence, including notification of the Editor's decision and requests for revision, takes place by e-mail removing the need for a paper trail. Editors should be alert to language in both submitted manuscripts and also in peer review reports or correspondence which could give rise to legal action for defamation or negligent misstatement. It is not unusual for an author or other party to raise an objection to a decision made by the editor, but the Elsevier policy is to rely on the editor's decision and to actively support it. Some journals have page limits for Communications. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations.
This allows the editor to consider the potential conflicts after the scientific merit is assessed. Plagiarism is understood to be an intentional act. This also applies to all authors designated within large multi-author groups and for on those occasions when authors report work on behalf of a larger group of investigators, upon which the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors provides guidance.
More information is available on our website.
How to write an email to journal editor
Authors cite disproportionately large numbers of their own articles in all or most of their publications. Standard techniques and methods used throughout the work should just be stated at the beginning of the section; descriptions of these are not needed. While some journals ask that all potential financial conflicts be disclosed, others ask authors to identify only those that exceed a certain monetary amount. Expressions of concern may be published if editors have well-founded concerns or suspicions and feel that readers should be made aware of potentially misleading information. It is not necessary to include detailed descriptions on the program or type of grants and awards. Editors should remind peer reviewers of this role, and of their requirement to: Respect the confidentiality of peer review, and not discuss the manuscript or contact the authors or any other people about the manuscript. Clearly indicate who will handle correspondence at all stages of refereeing and publication, also post-publication. See comment above re duplicate publication in another language. The editor should conduct his own independent investigation in accordance with the Elsevier publishing ethics policy. When appropriate, they should provide a forum e.
Some journals attempt to mask the identities of both the authors and reviewers double masked or double blind ; however, although masked, the identity of the author s may be known by the reviewers based on the area of research.
Conflicts of interest may be only potential or perceived, or they may be factual. Should an editor investigate based on anonymous publishing ethics complaints? Journals should consider sending copies of all correspondence with the corresponding author to all listed authors.
Editors are under no obligation to accept the authors' nominations. Permission of the Publisher is required for resale or distribution outside the institution and for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations.
All results that relate to the research question should be given in detail, including simple counts and percentages. Acknowledgements Collate acknowledgements in a separate section at the end of the article before the references and do not, therefore, include them on the title page, as a footnote to the title or otherwise.
Next, write a short paragraph that explains why your manuscript would be a good fit for the journal. Thus, letters are also a control mechanism that facilitates progress after an article has been published.
How to write an editorial example
This review can be done simultaneously with the evaluation of other journal statistics. Authorship The list of authors should accurately illustrate who contributed to the work and how. However, authors should still be able to stand "accountable" for ensuring investigation and resolution of "questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work. These might include relevant financial interests for example, patent ownership, stock ownership, consultancies, or speaker's fees , or personal, political, or religious interests. From a scientific perspective, fraud is the most serious, as it has the potential to mislead other researchers into fruitless areas of research, confuse readers, and possibly to cause harm especially with respect to medical research and drug treatments. Authors who are unable to provide an electronic version or have other circumstances that prevent online submission must contact the Editor prior to submission to discuss alternative options; email: jli elsevier. It should start off general and then focus in to the specific research question you are investigating. Clearly indicate who will handle correspondence at all stages of refereeing and publication, also post-publication. Responsibilities of Editors toward the Public Many responsibilities of editors toward the public are carried out through the mechanisms established for the processes and constituencies mentioned above. Use of wordprocessing software It is important that the file be saved in the native format of the wordprocessor used, including LaTeX. Conflicts of interest may be only potential or perceived, or they may be factual. Funding body agreements and policies Elsevier has established a number of agreements with funding bodies which allow authors to comply with their funder's open access policies.
Such statements could be particularly useful for e.
based on 90 review